The Philippine government, through Malacañang, has announced plans to file a motion for reconsideration with the Supreme Court regarding its ruling that deemed certain provisions on unprogrammed appropriations in the 2024 and 2025 General Appropriations Act (GAA) as unconstitutional.
Claire Castro, Palace Press Officer, stated that the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG) disagrees with parts of the Supreme Court's decision. Castro emphasized that the Supreme Court did not label unprogrammed appropriations as inherently unconstitutional, maintaining that it serves as a legitimate funding mechanism for the government, provided that its use complies with constitutional stipulations and legal conditions.
Castro clarified that since 2015, Congress has allowed the release of funds from unprogrammed appropriations when collections exceed target revenues from specified non-tax revenue sources, contingent upon conditions defined in law. She asserted that the Marcos administration is adhering to this existing policy and believes they have not violated any laws.
Consequently, Castro confirmed that Malacañang is respectfully requesting the Supreme Court to review its prior decision, and the OSG has been directed to proceed with filing the motion for reconsideration.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Malacañang's appeal about?
Malacañang is appealing the Supreme Court's decision that declared certain provisions related to unprogrammed appropriations in the 2024 and 2025 General Appropriations Act unconstitutional.
Who expressed the government's position on the Supreme Court ruling?
Claire Castro, the Palace Press Officer, articulated the government's stance and the plan to file a motion for reconsideration.
What is the basis for unprogrammed appropriations in previous laws?
Since 2015, Congress has permitted the release of funds from unprogrammed appropriations when collections surpass target non-tax revenues, as specified by legal conditions.
Reporting by Mc Esplanada for Rapport Philippines. This report was prepared from available source material and reviewed for factual consistency. Further verified updates will be added as the newsroom receives them.